The first region, when the laptop is using about 25 watts, is running a computational chemistry simulation called GAMESS that simulates atoms and small molecules using theoretical quantum chemistry. This first run is a simuluation with the laptop in power saving mode, so the CPU clock rate is limited to 1Ghz. It took about 200 seconds for this simulation to run. However, when the clock rate is increased to 2Ghz, and the simulation is restarted, it takes about half the amount of time, but almost double the power. Normally, scientists are impatient people, and want their results as soon as possible. So they will always want to use more power. Finally, the upward trend on the right side of the graph is the power consumption of the powerDemo graph program, which has not at all been optimized. yet. I wrote it as a demonstration and proof of concept, to give a nice visual indication of how much what you do with the cpu changes power consumption. What surpised me though, was that it took me longer to write the Iowa Grid Iowa Power fund proposal, than it did to write the demo app (which was about 2 days). If you have a linux laptop, you can try it out by downloading the Python code
Now let's say for example, that the load on the city of ames utility is approaching
105 MW. The city has probably instituted the Prime
Time power program, which cycles air conditioners off for 7 minutes of
every hour. If we can convince the scientists at Ames Laboratory
to wait a little longer for their results (not an easy task, btw), we might be able to reduce
the load on the city utility by 100KW.. so from 105.0 to 104.9 MW. This by
itself isn't a whole lot. But the same
software that talks to a city of Ames web site and figures out what the load (or
power cost) is could be running on 10,000 laptops. Ames has 50,000 people, and the
university has 25,000 students, so that number might be a little high. If half of those
laptops pop up a message saying "Peak power alert, can I shut down ?", and then
go into hibernate mode, or turn off, we've just shaved another 25KW from the
peak load. If we can do the same thing with 5000 desktop computers, which can
draw 100-500 watts, that is a LOT more power.